Yesterday,
7th November 2013, the Centre was
pleased to welcome Prof. Ivy Schweitzer (Professor of English and Women’s and
Gender Studies at Dartmouth College) to the third of the American Studies Seminar Series of 2013-2014. In collaboration with
the School of Critical Studies at the University of Glasgow, and as part of their
'English and American Literature Lecture Series,' Prof. Schweitzer discussed
‘More Pleasurable Reading We’re Not Doing: Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women.’ Below is this listener’s
brief summary of the lecture.
Louisa
May Alcott's Little Women, first
published in 1868, has gone on to become one of America's classic works of fiction.
The novel brings vividly to life New England during the nineteenth century, which
as Prof. Schweitzer demonstrated, Alcott was able to draw on from her own family
experiences. Indeed, as a child, Alcott struggled with the ladylike behaviour
that was expected of girls in the nineteenth century. Drawing on allusions to
the character of Jo March in Little Women,
Prof. Schweitzer revealed that Alcott too was a tomboy whose favourite
childhood activity was running through the fields of Concord, where she would
literally lift up her dress and run for miles. Like Jo, Alcott had an unladylike
temper that she struggled to control and could not get over her disappointment
in not being a boy, since opportunities for women were limited at the time.
In
beautifully telling the story of how both she and her daughter came to read Little Women recently, Prof. Schweitzer discussed
the various surprises she stumbled across as she digested it. For instance, in
the character of Marmee March (the mother), we can find an incandescent rage
that ripples through the pages, with Prof. Schweitzer highlighting a key except
in which Marmee states:
I am angry nearly every day of my
life, Jo; but I have learned not to show it; and I still hope to learn not to
feel it, though it may take me another forty years to do so.
Marmee
makes this statement when she tells Jo that she too struggles with a bad
temper. Throughout the novel, however, Marmee seems serene and composed, which
suggests that the appearance of a docile woman may hide turmoil underneath.
Confiding in impetuous Jo about her own flares of temper that she had learned
to control through discipline, help from her husband, and prayer makes Jo feel
better, as she realises that she is not the only one with a temper. At the same
time though, Marmee’s words suggest that there is no hope for Jo—Marmee is
still angry after forty years, and perhaps Jo will be too. As Prof. Schweitzer
highlighted, this is likely an expression of anger by Alcott about
nineteenth-century society’s demand that women be domestic, and is a compellingly
honest narrative in comparison to Victorian literature of the time. As she read
Little Women then, this form of anger
helped Prof. Schweitzer transform the novel into a feminine quest story, with
Jo as its central protagonist. For Prof. Schweitzer, her own pleasure in
reading Little Women came through a
rejection of the marriage plots and romance entanglements, and instead by
basking in the story of Jo – or as she termed it, ‘…an interpretive rebellion
of the novel.’
As
Prof. Schweitzer highlighted then, Little
Women was a fiction novel written for girls that veered from the
normal writings for children, especially girls, at the time. And since, it has
been championed by feminists for more than a century because an untamed Jo is
so compellingly portrayed throughout most of the novel. Also, in the novel’s
characterisation of the March sisters, rebellion is often valued over
conformity. Likewise, whilst most of the novel confirms Victorian womanhood
stereotypes, it also gives voice to transgender identity, amongst a host of
other things. So while Little Women can
be called a didactic novel, the question of what it teaches remains open.
Prof.
Schweitzer then linked this to a discussion of contemporary heroines in
relation to Jo. Whilst Bella is somewhat presented as an independent woman in
the Twilight novels, Prof. Schweitzer
found more in common between Jo and Katniss from the Hunger Games trilogy (A somewhat interesting Washington Post article on Katniss and her relation to heroines can
be found here - http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-03-22/lifestyle/35448255_1_katniss-everdeen-heroines-young-adult).
In
closing, Prof. Schweitzer highlighted how her talk was part of a wider project for
J19: The Journal of Nineteenth-Century
Americanists, titled ‘Jo––She’s the Man! Recovering Little Women.’ In her lecture, Prof. Schweitzer
mixed history, biography, literary criticism and a personal narrative to
provide a detailed picture of Little
Women, Louisa May Alcott, and the various ways we can interpret her famous
work of art. In what was an informative and highly popular lecture (the seminar
room was filled to the rafters), Prof. Schweitzer captured the importance of reinterpreting
classic novels, often considered ‘children’s novels’, to reveal some of their
subtle but significant themes. I am sure I was not the only one in the audience
who, on returning home, felt a necessity to re-read Alcott’s novel with this
talk in mind.
By Joe Ryan-Hume
PGR at the University of Glasgow
The Centre’s seminar series
continues with Prof. Doug Rossinow (Metropolitan State University) ‘A Movement
of Movements or a Conjuncture of Forces? Interpreting the 1960s, Half a Century
On.’ This will be held on Wednesday 20th November in Room 208, 2 University
Gardens, at 5:15pm. All very welcome!
No comments:
Post a Comment